<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Art History Departments Worried Over Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=1689</link>
	<description>News for Art Historians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lackman</title>
		<link>http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=1689&#038;cpage=1#comment-138649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lackman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=1689#comment-138649</guid>
		<description>New &quot;history and history of art&quot; rankings out now from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/table/2010/jun/04/university-guide-history-and-history-of-art?CMP=twt_gu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New &#8220;history and history of art&#8221; rankings out now from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/table/2010/jun/04/university-guide-history-and-history-of-art?CMP=twt_gu" rel="nofollow">The Guardian</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lackman</title>
		<link>http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=1689&#038;cpage=1#comment-138612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lackman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=1689#comment-138612</guid>
		<description>In its defense, the NRC asserted recently in a &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://sites.nationalacademies.org/xpedio/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_057196.ppt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;powerpoint presentation&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;There is a trade-off between speed and accuracy. We spent a lot of time trying to get universities to provide comparable data and developing our model. In most fields, and especially now, doctoral faculty change relatively slowly, as do patterns of publication. We would like to update the study in the next two years. Now that we have developed the statistical machinery, it is a data updating task, which could be carried out on-line. But, we will need to obtain funding.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its defense, the NRC asserted recently in a <a target="_blank" href="http://sites.nationalacademies.org/xpedio/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_057196.ppt" rel="nofollow">powerpoint presentation</a>, &#8220;There is a trade-off between speed and accuracy. We spent a lot of time trying to get universities to provide comparable data and developing our model. In most fields, and especially now, doctoral faculty change relatively slowly, as do patterns of publication. We would like to update the study in the next two years. Now that we have developed the statistical machinery, it is a data updating task, which could be carried out on-line. But, we will need to obtain funding.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lackman</title>
		<link>http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=1689&#038;cpage=1#comment-138605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lackman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=1689#comment-138605</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, American academics are &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/05/10/nrc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;still waiting&lt;/a&gt; for the National Research Council to release its now years-and-years-late report on its now thoroughly outdated (congressionally mandated) ratings of graduate programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, American academics are <a target="_blank" href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/05/10/nrc" rel="nofollow">still waiting</a> for the National Research Council to release its now years-and-years-late report on its now thoroughly outdated (congressionally mandated) ratings of graduate programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
