<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;The Warburg Institute is fighting for its life&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=2356</link>
	<description>News for Art Historians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=2356&#038;cpage=1#comment-139181</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=2356#comment-139181</guid>
		<description>The description of the idiosyncratic arrangement of the books by theme reminds me somehow of the Barnes Foundation&#039;s eccentric curatorial vision -- more evidence for the unique value of individual judgment.

Hypothesis: institutions and collections created by quirky millionaires are more interesting and valuable than equally well-funded institutions created by armies of sober nonprofit employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The description of the idiosyncratic arrangement of the books by theme reminds me somehow of the Barnes Foundation&#8217;s eccentric curatorial vision &#8212; more evidence for the unique value of individual judgment.</p>
<p>Hypothesis: institutions and collections created by quirky millionaires are more interesting and valuable than equally well-funded institutions created by armies of sober nonprofit employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
