Archives for October 2007
Impressionist Criticism
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
“…I led him before the Ploughed Field of M. Pissarro. At the sight of this astounding landscape, the good man thought that the lenses of his spectacles were dirty. He wiped them carefully and replaced them on his nose. “By Michalon!” he cried. “What on earth is that?” “You see … a hoarfrost on deeply [...]
Read ‘Impressionist Criticism’
Manet Criticism
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
“Throughout the twenty-four years of his active artistic life Edouard Manet continually sent his paintings to the Salon where he met criticism which in constancy and bitterness surpassed that directed against any of his nineteenth-century predecessors.” [George Heard Hamilton, Manet and His Critics, p. 4]
All the following quotations are taken from Hamilton unless otherwise indicated:
“[Théodore [...]
Courbet Criticism
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
“To the exhibition of paintings by Courbet. I was amazed at the strength and relief of his principal picture–but what a picture! what a subject to choose! The vulgarity of the forms would not signify, the vulgarity and futility of the idea is what is so abominable, and even that might pass if only the [...]
Delacroix Criticism
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
“Badly maimed horses in a more than foreign land, beneath an impossible sky, an incredibly dirty colouring and drawing which is wilfully inaccurate.” [by Vergnaud, taken from Art Criticism and Its Institutions In Nineteenth-Century France, p. 74]
Even his defenders seem horrified by him at times: “Quelle pâleur pestiférée ! quel ciel étrange et malade, vert [...]
Corot Criticism
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
Vol. 2 of Corot, raconté par lui-même et par ses amis (Vézenaz-Genève: Pierre Cailler, 1946) has a chapter entitled “Sottisier” [pp. 195-199]. I’ll include here my rough translations, sometimes together with the French originals:
C’est un malheureux qui promène sur sa toile une éponge qu’il a trempée dans la boue. (Définition de Corot par M. de [...]
Art Criticism in the 1830s
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
The notion of 1830 as a turning point toward virulence in French arts criticism seems born out by my reading. “Even Ingres, so often regarded as the archconservative, was disgusted with the treatment which the critics accorded his work at the Salon of 1834 and refused to exhibit there again.” [George Heard Hamilton, Manet and [...]
Read ‘Art Criticism in the 1830s’
Is there an art of invective?
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
In his article, “Comment fonctionne la polémique ,” Artur Greive argues that lexicographers have defined polemics as hostilities, excesses, or art.
In the Meyers Konversationslexikon of 1890, polemic is not dispute itself, but rather “the art of conducting a dispute” (”Streitkunst”). The majority speaker rebuking the opposition for indulging in “small-bore polemics,” does he think of [...]
Read ‘Is there an art of invective?’
Observations on Invective Art Criticism
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
“Now that calm has settled over this grand name – of those that posterity will not forget – it is difficult to imagine the tumult, the scorching dust, in which he lived. Each of his works occasioned deafening clamors, storms, furious discussions. The artist was showered with insults more offensive and ignominious than would ever [...]
Read ‘Observations on Invective Art Criticism’
Insults
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
Insults are of course related to invective. They are usually oral, whereas invective is usually written. as Robert M. Adams’ argues in Bad Mouth: Fugitive Papers on the Dark Side (Berkeley and L.A.: University of California, 1977). He notes that in the Greek epics, the hero insults his foes before battle, presumably to steel his [...]
Censorship and Art Criticism
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
I have a certain hypothesis: when censorship is applied much more strongly to political commentary than to artistic commentary, the latter will absorb some of the energy of the repressed political debate (Wrigley advanced a similar notion in passing). In one manifestation, the quality of a nation’s art is treated as a referendum the welfare [...]
Read ‘Censorship and Art Criticism’
Invective Nostalgia
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
Have we lost the art of invective? In the 1979 Traité d’injurologie, Robert Edouard wrote
One need only take a few steps down the street, travel a few kilometers down our clogged highways, receive a “free warning” from the finance minister, listen to the radio, watch the television … or even flip through certain women’s magazines [...]
Why Study Invective Art Criticism?
30 October 2007 | Uncategorized
So much invective criticism we now consider to have been badly wrongheaded. So why study it? In Bad Art (London: Chatto & Windus, 1989), Quentin Bell writes [p.9]
… history, so it seems to me, cannot afford to neglect any major historical phenomenon … [and] our perception of the goodness in art is determined by some [...]
Read ‘Why Study Invective Art Criticism?’
Polemic and Violence
15 October 2007 | Uncategorized
In their 1999 book Polemicization: The Contingency of the Commonplace (NY: NYU Press), Benjamin Arditi and Jeremy Valentine write:
… argumentation should not be confused with a purely non-violent exchange between equals. From different perspectives Lefort and Fraser challenge the belief that speech is the sole medium of persuasion and that it cannot transmit inequality of [...]
© Jon Lackman. Powered by WordPress. Disclaimer.
Feeds: Atom, RSS.
Design: Ben de Groot. Photo: USGS.
About Me. Contact Me. Read The Art History Newsletter.
